<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Live Streaming event video, a revolution in waiting?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.xsive.co.nz/archives/231/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.xsive.co.nz/archives/231</link>
	<description>Weblog for X$!Ve.co.nz, Campbell Anderson Flex Developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:23:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://blog.xsive.co.nz/archives/231/comment-page-1#comment-117569</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 07:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xsive.co.nz/archives/231#comment-117569</guid>
		<description>Hi there,,, I thought the zoomr live stream was in flash and the chat client was in Java?? thats what it was on ustream.tv anyway???

Im with you on this one, although I think the big advantage of the online medium is not having to wait for the broadcast schedule to roll around,,,, so having it for download after the event will most likely get more views than the actual live event stream.

However, the whole streaming video online thing seems to be a false economy.... the more viewers i get for a stream, the more money it costs..... whereas a TV broadcast doesnt cost anymore if 1 person is watching or 100000 people are watching, it actually becomes more cost effective....???? this make any sense to anyone???? I can see broadcasters using their dtv signals to send content out rather than trying to squeeze it down the tiny little expensive pipe. this doesnt help jonny85 who wants to setup a backyard tv show of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,,, I thought the zoomr live stream was in flash and the chat client was in Java?? thats what it was on ustream.tv anyway???</p>
<p>Im with you on this one, although I think the big advantage of the online medium is not having to wait for the broadcast schedule to roll around,,,, so having it for download after the event will most likely get more views than the actual live event stream.</p>
<p>However, the whole streaming video online thing seems to be a false economy&#8230;. the more viewers i get for a stream, the more money it costs&#8230;.. whereas a TV broadcast doesnt cost anymore if 1 person is watching or 100000 people are watching, it actually becomes more cost effective&#8230;.???? this make any sense to anyone???? I can see broadcasters using their dtv signals to send content out rather than trying to squeeze it down the tiny little expensive pipe. this doesnt help jonny85 who wants to setup a backyard tv show of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

