<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flex on Rails not a dream any more!!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.xsive.co.nz/archives/202/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.xsive.co.nz/archives/202</link>
	<description>Weblog for X$!Ve.co.nz, Campbell Anderson Flex Developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:23:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ø§Ù†Ù…ÙŠ</title>
		<link>http://blog.xsive.co.nz/archives/202/comment-page-1#comment-134230</link>
		<dc:creator>Ø§Ù†Ù…ÙŠ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xsive.co.nz/archives/202#comment-134230</guid>
		<description>tanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex MacCaw</title>
		<link>http://blog.xsive.co.nz/archives/202/comment-page-1#comment-80309</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex MacCaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 17:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xsive.co.nz/archives/202#comment-80309</guid>
		<description>Does the WebORB security mechanism limit what methods are called on the model? For example, my current setup uses REST. If users make a call to /folders they get a response containing all the folders they own. Now, with the weborb setup, wouldn&#039;t  it be possible to do &#039;Folder.find(:all)&#039; from flex and get all the folders! Surely there are massive security implications unless you can limit what methods are called on the server side (like weborb does currently)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the WebORB security mechanism limit what methods are called on the model? For example, my current setup uses REST. If users make a call to /folders they get a response containing all the folders they own. Now, with the weborb setup, wouldn&#8217;t  it be possible to do &#8216;Folder.find(:all)&#8217; from flex and get all the folders! Surely there are massive security implications unless you can limit what methods are called on the server side (like weborb does currently)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Piller</title>
		<link>http://blog.xsive.co.nz/archives/202/comment-page-1#comment-79759</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Piller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 12:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xsive.co.nz/archives/202#comment-79759</guid>
		<description>Alex, the server side endpoints supporting the framework can be secured using WebORB security mechanism, which is very strong. Even if someone hacks together a Flex application, you still need to authenticate yourself to break-in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, the server side endpoints supporting the framework can be secured using WebORB security mechanism, which is very strong. Even if someone hacks together a Flex application, you still need to authenticate yourself to break-in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex MacCaw</title>
		<link>http://blog.xsive.co.nz/archives/202/comment-page-1#comment-79757</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex MacCaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 12:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xsive.co.nz/archives/202#comment-79757</guid>
		<description>Has anyone thought of the security implications involved? Even if you authenticate users, someone could just make a flex application that accesses server side data that it shouldn&#039;t...
Active Resource for flex (REST) is an alternative , for example:
var delegate:Post = new Post( this );
var o:Object = new Object()
o.name = â€œfooâ€
delegate.save(o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone thought of the security implications involved? Even if you authenticate users, someone could just make a flex application that accesses server side data that it shouldn&#8217;t&#8230;<br />
Active Resource for flex (REST) is an alternative , for example:<br />
var delegate:Post = new Post( this );<br />
var o:Object = new Object()<br />
o.name = â€œfooâ€<br />
delegate.save(o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

